School leaders reviewing evidence during a diagnostic conversation

Thinking School Diagnostic™

Know where you are before deciding where to go.

A structured school self-assessment that identifies your strongest thinking capabilities, priority gaps and practical evidence-informed actions.

Enquire

From R15 000

Investment is determined by school size, stakeholder participation and the scope of evidence required. Reported within ten working days of receiving complete submissions.

Best for
Schools identifying where to start.
Focus
Strengths & gaps in school-wide thinking.
Method
Self-assessment, evidence review & analysis.
Output
Thinking School Profile & 90-day action plan.

Understand your school. Identify what matters.

School leaders and educators complete a structured self-assessment, supported by a small set of existing school documents.

We analyse the responses, compare perspectives and check them against the evidence to identify strengths and priority gaps.

A clear starting point.

  • A Thinking School Profile
  • Identified strengths and three priority areas
  • A practical 90-day action plan
  • A 60-minute leadership debrief

Understand

The diagnostic works in four layers.

  1. Self-assessment

    Selected members of your school community rate 40 statements across ten dimensions of thinking.

  2. Evidence check

    Your school submits a small, specified set of existing documents. No new work is created.

  3. Analysis

    Responses are scored, patterns and gaps identified, and perception tested against evidence.

  4. Recommendations

    Findings are professionally interpreted and translated into a 90-day action plan.

Investment

From R15 000

Investment is determined by school size, stakeholder participation and the scope of evidence required. Reported within ten working days of receiving complete submissions.

Enquire

Next service

Thinking School Audit™

Move beyond perception. Examine the evidence.

Continue

Before we begin

FAQs

Clear answers about finding
the right starting point.

Declining results, shallow learner thinking, curriculum or teaching gaps, weak assessment, and coverage that has displaced depth and inquiry.

Take the Diagnostic